Narrowing Definition

Trying to compile my findings thus far in one place. Most of my research seems to be confirming the same things thus far unfortunately.

Based on the defining features identified by others and repetitive themes in my research, I've made my own set of defining philosophies for Stylepress. After writing them I realized they are essentially Renards factors but slightly reworded and prioritized. Below are what research has lead me to believe is the result of these philosophies. Number 4 is part defining factor, part derivative of factors 1, 2 and 3. As with Renards factors not all of them need to be present to be defined as part of the Stylepress although in my opinion it is essential to have one of the leading two factors featuring prominently.

Primary Factors
1. Driven by the creators desire to realize their vision.
2. Experimental or unconventional approaches aesthetic and format.

Almost Primary (not quite secondary) Factors
3. Focuses on user experience and timeless content.
4. Exists in a bubble separate to mainstream media

Derivatives:- Inevitably Becomes a personal manifesto of the creator/team, declaring their tastes, philosophies, interest and ideas. (1)
- Becomes inspirational to the viewer. (1, 2, 3)
- Often realized in a physical form. (1, 2, 3, 4)
- Recontextualizes the magazine as an art object rather than news media. (2, 3, 4)
- Can talk directly to niche groups such as graphic designers. (4)

What it means for my project:
1. The perfect vessel to declare a position on current graphic design issues.
2. Ideal oppurtunity to experiment with new ideas and formats unrestricted by current audience requirements.
3. Allows the oppurtunity for a stylepress magazine to set a 'standard' for creative practice by (2.) inspiring the decisions of the reader to (4.) influence their creative practice.